Can AI Analytics Tools Be Trusted with Business Metrics?

By Andrey Avtomonov, CTO at Kaelio | 2x founder in AI + Data | ex-CERN, ex-Dataiku · February 2026

AI analytics tools can be trusted with business metrics when they incorporate proper governance, semantic layers, and continuous monitoring. According to NIST, trustworthy AI requires systems to be "valid and reliable, safe, secure and resilient," with transparent query logic and consistent metric definitions across the organization.

At a Glance

• AI hallucinations occur in 15 to 20 percent of responses from even advanced models, making governance essential for business metrics
• Organizations spend 30 to 50 percent of innovation time making AI solutions compliant with regulations
• Semantic layers ensure consistent metric definitions across all tools and teams
• Row-level security and query transparency are fundamental requirements for trustworthy AI analytics
• Continuous monitoring catches data drift and errors before they impact decisions
• Platforms like Kaelio integrate with existing governance infrastructure rather than replacing it

AI analytics tools promise to transform how organizations extract insights from data. But with the data and analytics industry undergoing industry shifts, executives are right to ask: can we actually rely on these numbers?

The answer is nuanced. Yes, AI analytics tools can be trusted with business metrics, but only when the platform is designed for transparency, governance, and continuous monitoring. A new McKinsey survey underscores that responsible AI practices are essential for organizations to capture the full potential of AI.

This post offers a comprehensive playbook for evaluating, implementing, and maintaining trustworthy AI analytics, whether you are a data leader building governance frameworks or a business user seeking reliable answers.

AI analytics promises speed -- can we trust the numbers?

AI analytics tools let users ask questions in plain English and receive immediate, data-driven answers. They interpret queries, generate SQL, and surface insights without requiring users to master BI tools or write code. The appeal is obvious: faster decisions, reduced bottlenecks, and broader access to data.

But speed without accuracy is dangerous. According to NIST, characteristics of trustworthy AI systems include being "valid and reliable, safe, secure and resilient, accountable and transparent, explainable and interpretable, privacy-enhanced, and fair with harmful bias managed."

Trustworthy AI is not a single feature. It is a spectrum of characteristics that must be balanced. Neglecting any single attribute, whether transparency, security, or fairness, weakens the entire system.

For business metrics specifically, trust requires:

• Consistent metric definitions across tools and teams
• Transparent query logic that users can inspect
• Governance controls that prevent unauthorized access
• Continuous monitoring to catch drift and errors

Without these foundations, AI analytics becomes a liability rather than an asset.

Where AI analytics can go wrong: common failure modes

Understanding the risks helps organizations build appropriate safeguards. AI analytics tools can fail in several predictable ways.

Hallucinations

AI hallucinations occur when systems generate information that is false, misleading, or entirely fabricated. Recent studies suggest that hallucinations occur in approximately 15 to 20 percent of responses from even state-of-the-art models.

The risks are concrete: misinformation, brand damage, legal liability, and loss of user trust. In financial contexts, a hallucinated revenue figure could trigger flawed strategic decisions.

Compliance Delays

In our experience, roughly 30 to 50 percent of a team's "innovation" time with gen AI is spent on making the solution compliant or waiting for compliance requirements to solidify. This friction slows adoption and creates shadow analytics practices.

Cyber Abuse

AI systems can be exploited by malicious actors. In a documented case, an AI executed 80 to 90 percent of all tactical work independently during a cyber espionage campaign, highlighting the potential for misuse when safeguards are inadequate.

An important limitation emerged during that investigation: the AI frequently overstated findings and occasionally fabricated data during autonomous operations. This underscores that even sophisticated AI requires human oversight.

Knowledge and Training Gaps

IDC research notes that "although data and analytics technologies have existed and have been leveraged for decades, the emergence of GenAI and maturation of classic AI/ML have created an environment of great expectations and great concerns for all organizations."

Key takeaway: AI analytics tools introduce new categories of risk that require proactive governance, not just reactive fixes.

How do semantics, governance, and access controls build trust?

Trust in AI analytics is not accidental. It is engineered through specific technical and process building blocks.

Semantic Layers

A semantic layer centralizes metric definitions so that "revenue" or "churn" means the same thing in every dashboard, report, and AI-generated answer. By centralizing metric definitions, data teams can ensure consistent self-service access to these metrics in downstream data tools and applications.

When a metric definition changes in the semantic layer, it refreshes everywhere it is invoked, creating consistency across all applications. This eliminates the frustrating scenario where metrics drift across tools and teams.

Row-Level Security

Row-level security (RLS) controls access to specific rows in a database table based on group membership or execution context. According to Microsoft documentation, row-level security simplifies the design and coding of security in your application.

The access restriction logic lives in the database tier, not in any single application tier. This means every tool, including AI analytics, inherits the same security rules automatically.

Risk Management Frameworks

The NIST AI Risk Management Framework provides a structured approach through four core functions. The AI RMF Core provides outcomes and actions that enable dialogue, understanding, and activities to manage AI risks through Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage functions.

These frameworks help organizations move from ad hoc governance to systematic risk management.

Key takeaway: Semantic layers provide consistency, row-level security enforces access control, and risk frameworks operationalize governance across the organization.

How to test and verify AI analytics outputs

Evaluation is essential before deploying AI analytics in production. Several frameworks and benchmarks help measure accuracy and bias.

Evaluation Catalogs

Evidently AI offers both a catalog of 100+ evaluations and a framework to easily configure custom metrics. This allows organizations to test AI outputs against domain-specific requirements.

Adaptive and Static Rubrics

Google Cloud's Vertex AI uses a test-driven framework for evaluation. Adaptive rubrics are dynamically generated for each prompt, providing granular pass or fail feedback. Static rubrics apply consistent scoring across all prompts for standardized benchmarking.

Key metrics include:

• GROUNDING: Checks for factuality and consistency against a provided source text, crucial for RAG systems
• INSTRUCTION_FOLLOWING: Measures how well responses adhere to constraints
• SAFETY: Assesses responses for policy violations

Bias and Sensitivity Testing

Mayo Clinic Platform's Validate product measures model sensitivity, specificity, and bias, which can help close racial, gender, and socioeconomic gaps in outcomes. By testing against extensive datasets from more than 10 million patients, Validate provides credibility that siloed testing cannot match.

Key takeaway: Combine automated evaluation frameworks with domain-specific testing to catch accuracy issues before they reach production.

Which AI analytics vendors deserve your trust?

Vendor selection requires evaluating platforms across security, lineage, and governance capabilities.

Market Recognition

ThoughtSpot was named a Leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Analytics and Business Intelligence Platforms. The evaluation criteria emphasize that buyers need platforms to support governance, interoperability, and AI capabilities alongside cloud ecosystem integration.

Security and Compliance

Platforms vary significantly in their security posture. Hightouch, for example, is SOC 2 Type II certified, meaning they have implemented controls to protect customer data and ensure security and confidentiality. They encrypt data in transit using TLS 1.2 and at rest using AES-256.

Data Lineage

Lineage capabilities help trace how metrics are calculated. Metaplane automatically parses queries from your warehouse and metadata from connected tools to generate lineage diagrams. When Metaplane has access to warehouse query logs, it can parse SQL statements to build column-level lineage.

If 21 days pass with no update to the lineage, Metaplane removes stale connections when new lineage information arrives, keeping the view current.

Governance Depth

Not all platforms treat governance equally. Some bolt on security features after the fact. Others, like Kaelio, build governance into the architecture from the start. Kaelio inherits permissions, roles, and policies from existing systems and generates queries that respect established controls. It connects to your existing semantic layers and governance tools rather than replacing them.

Keeping AI answers honest in production

Deploying AI analytics is not a one-time event. Ongoing monitoring ensures answers remain accurate as data and business logic evolve.

Data Observability

A Forrester Total Economic Impact study found that Monte Carlo's data observability platform delivered a 358% return on investment. Organizations reclaimed more than 6,500 data personnel hours annually and avoided more than $1.5 million in lost revenue due to data downtime.

Real-Time Detection

Speed matters. Galileo AI helped a leading FinTech company achieve 30% efficiency gains in AI monitoring workflows and reduced mean time to detect from days to minutes with real-time protection.

"Before Galileo, we could go three days before knowing if something bad is happening. With Galileo, we can know within minutes," noted a Distinguished Engineer at the company.

The Cost of Downtime

The stakes are significant. Unplanned downtime costs the Global 2000 a staggering $400 billion annually, with each company facing an average loss of $200 million per year. Proactive monitoring reduces both frequency and severity of incidents.

A seven-point checklist for selecting a trustworthy AI analytics platform

Use this checklist when evaluating AI analytics tools:

1. Semantic layer integration: Does the platform connect to your existing metric definitions, or does it create a competing source of truth?

2. Row-level security inheritance: Are access controls enforced at the database tier and inherited by the AI layer?

3. Query transparency: Can users see the SQL or logic behind every answer?

4. Lineage and auditability: Does the platform trace data from source to consumption, including transformations?

5. Compliance certifications: Is the vendor SOC 2 Type II certified? HIPAA compliant if needed?

6. Observability capabilities: Does the platform support ongoing monitoring for data drift and errors?

7. Enterprise integration: Does it work with your existing data warehouse, transformation layer, and BI tools?

IDC research indicates that the influence of chief data and analytics officers will grow, and AI agents will transform data teams. Platforms that support this evolution, rather than fight it, will deliver lasting value.

Businesses today are drowning in data complexity: the average organization uses over 400 data sources. And over 70% of enterprises report that their lineage is incomplete or outdated. Choosing a platform that addresses these realities is critical.

Kaelio was built for this environment. It acts as an intelligent interface across your existing data stack, learning from how people ask questions and helping data teams improve definitions and documentation over time. With SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance, it meets strict enterprise requirements while making analytics accessible to business users.

Trust isn't optional -- why governed AI analytics is the future

AI analytics tools can absolutely be trusted with business metrics, but trust must be engineered, not assumed. Responsible AI practices reduce hallucinations, semantic layers ensure consistency, row-level security protects sensitive data, and observability catches problems before they cascade.

The organizations that invest in these foundations will move faster with confidence. Those that skip governance will spend their time explaining wrong numbers to executives.

"Modern data environments are highly distributed, diverse, dynamic, and dark, complicating data management and analytics as organizations seek to leverage new advancements in generative AI while maintaining control," says Stewart Bond, vice president of Data Intelligence and Integration at IDC, in the IDC FutureScape report.

The path forward is clear: choose platforms that prioritize transparency, integrate with your existing governance infrastructure, and provide continuous monitoring. Kaelio delivers on all three, helping organizations turn AI analytics from a risk into a competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key characteristics of trustworthy AI analytics tools?

Trustworthy AI analytics tools should be valid, reliable, safe, secure, accountable, transparent, explainable, and privacy-enhanced, with managed bias.

How can AI analytics tools fail in business settings?

AI analytics tools can fail through hallucinations, compliance delays, cyber abuse, and knowledge gaps, leading to misinformation and strategic errors.

What role do semantic layers play in AI analytics?

Semantic layers centralize metric definitions, ensuring consistency across dashboards and reports, and preventing metric drift across tools and teams.

How does Kaelio ensure trust in AI analytics?

Kaelio ensures trust by integrating with existing data stacks, inheriting governance controls, and providing transparency and continuous monitoring.

What is the importance of row-level security in AI analytics?

Row-level security controls access to specific data rows based on user roles, ensuring consistent security across all applications, including AI analytics.

Sources

1. https://assets.super.so/3bbebd16-e217-4263-b0ea-fb26b93b0097/files/418c84fc-daa4-45e3-9012-e4ba1445d441.pdf
2. https://hal.science/hal-05101613v1/document
3. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/overcoming%20two%20issues%20that%20are%20sinking%20gen%20ai%20programs/overcoming-two-issues-that-are-sinking-gen-ai-programsfinal.pdf?shouldIndex=false+https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mckinsey.com%2F~%2Fmedia%2Fmckinsey%2Fbusiness+functions%2Fmckinsey+digital%2Four+insights%2Fovercoming+two+issues+that+are+sinking+gen+ai+programs%2Fovercoming-two-issues-that-are-sinking-gen-ai-programsfinal.pdf%3FshouldIndex%3Dfalse
4. https://go.thoughtspot.com/analyst-report-gartner-magic-quadrant-2024.html
5. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/tech-forward/insights-on-responsible-ai-from-the-global-ai-trust-maturity-survey
6. https://assets.anthropic.com/m/ec212e6566a0d47/original/Disrupting-the-first-reported-AI-orchestrated-cyber-espionage-campaign.pdf
7. https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=US52640324
8. https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/use-dbt-semantic-layer/dbt-semantic-layer
9. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/data-warehouse/row-level-security
10. https://airc.nist.gov/AIRMFKnowledgeBase/AIRMF
11. https://docs.evidentlyai.com/metrics/introduction
12. https://docs.cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/docs/models/determine-eval
13. https://www.mayoclinicplatform.org/validate/
14. https://go.thoughtspot.com/analyst-report-gartner-magic-quadrant-2025.html
15. https://www.hightouch.com/security
16. https://docs.metaplane.dev/docs/lineage
17. https://tei.forrester.com/go/montecarlo/dataaiobservabilityplatform/docs/TheTEIOfMonteCarlosDataAIObservabilityPlatform.pdf
18. https://galileo.ai/case-studies/galileo-helps-a-leading-fintech-solution-reduce-mean-time-to-detect-from-days-to-minutes
19. https://www.splunk.com/en_us/pdfs/gated/ebooks/the-hidden-costs-of-downtime.pdf
20. https://www.alation.com/blog/automated-data-lineage-guide/